The Sanctions Paradox: Why America Punishes India for Russian Oil It Now Wants for Itself

1. Introduction: The sanctions paradox

On 9 October 2026 the US Treasury licensed the sale, delivery and importation of Russian diesel, including into the United States, until 7 April 2027 (OFAC 2026). Twenty-one days earlier the President had signed a statute authorising duties of up to 100 per cent on the five largest buyers of Russian crude or gas, a group India's volumes place it in: 87.5 million tonnes in 2024-25, against 108.5 for China (Public Law 119-111 2026, sec. 113; DGCI&S 2025). India had already carried a 25 per cent penalty duty for the same trade from 27 August 2025 to 7 February 2026 (White House 2026; Outlook Business 2025).

Why does sanctions policy flex when the sanctioner's own prices rise? Drezner (1999) put the sanctioner's opportunity costs into a model of coercion; this article asks what happens when they spike. It tests three propositions (Figure 1): relief tracks the sanctioner's price stress (P1); penalties track the target's dependence (P2); the EU's exception differs by design (P3); Table 5 gives verdicts.

Figure 1. The sanctions paradox: an analytical framework.

Author-created conceptual diagram of the proposed mechanism; it is not empirical proof of causation. Sections 2–5 test each link.

2. The pressure on India

Executive Order 14329 added a 25 per cent duty on Indian goods from 27 August 2025 because India imported Russian oil directly or indirectly (Outlook Business 2025; White House 2026). The rate overstates the loss: officials counted about $48 billion of exposed exports against $86.5 billion shipped to the United States in 2024-25, since pharmaceuticals, electronics and energy products were exempt (Outlook Business 2025). Even so, 25 per cent of that base is $12.1 billion a year, 2.4 times the roughly $5 billion annual discount on Russian crude (CPR 2025). If Indian exporters bore more than 41 per cent of the duty, the penalty outweighed the discount (Table 2); that threshold is not an incidence estimate.

An order of 6 February 2026 ended the duty from 7 February, citing India's commitment to stop Russian purchases, buy American energy and expand defence cooperation (White House 2026; Table 1). Russian crude had meanwhile risen from about 2 per cent of India's imports in 2021-22 to 35.9 per cent in 2023-24 (DGCI&S 2025; Figure 2).

Table 1. Chronology of the instruments

Date	Instrument and scope	Stated rationale or purpose	Documented detail or note
6 Aug 2025 (in force 27 Aug)	Executive Order 14329: additional 25% ad valorem duty on Indian goods (IEEPA)	India importing Russian oil directly or indirectly	Commerce Ministry: about $48bn of US-bound exports exposed (2024 values); pharmaceuticals, energy and electronics exempt
Oct–Nov 2025	OFAC designation of Rosneft and Lukoil (wind-down to 21 Nov)	Not examined here	Confounder: Indian intake fell to 1.38 mb/d (27.4% share) in December
21 Jan 2026	EU Reg. 833/2014, Art. 3ma (adopted 18 Jul 2025): ban on products refined from Russian crude	Close the third-country refining route	Partner countries including the US exempt; India and Turkey supply about 400 kb/d of products to Europe
7 Feb 2026 (order of 6 Feb)	Executive Order 14384 ends the 25% duty	India’s commitment to stop Russian oil imports, buy US energy, expand defence cooperation	Commerce to monitor resumption; on 20 Feb the Supreme Court held that IEEPA confers no tariff power
5 Mar–17 Jun 2026	OFAC GL 133 (India) and GL 134 to 134C (all buyers): Russian oil already loaded	Keep oil flowing during the Iran war (began 28 Feb); “short-term”	Two renewals followed statements that none was planned; lapsed 17 Jun
25 Apr 2026; 1 Jan 2027	Reg. (EU) 2026/261 (26 Jan 2026): bans short-term, then long-term, Russian LNG contracts	Phase out Russian gas	Dated and legislated; Yamal flows continue within the transition (Figure 4)
18 Sep 2026	Public Law 119-111: §112 duties up to 500% on Russian goods; §113 up to 100% on top-five buyers of Russian crude or gas	Raise the cost of Russian energy trade	First determinations due 18 Oct; waiver (§115); licensing power (§114(h)); gas carve-out (§113(d))
9 Oct 2026	OFAC GL 135: Russian-origin diesel, including imports into the US, to 7 Apr 2027	Lower fuel prices before the November midterms (as reported)	No verified deliveries; sovereign accounts excluded; Russia has freed 500,000 t. Author: first licence in the series with no loading-date limit

Sources: White House (2026); Outlook Business (2025); Baker McKenzie (2026a–c); Fieldfisher (2025); Reuters (2026a, 2026b); S&P Global (2025); SCOTUSblog (2026); AP (2026); Kyiv Independent (2026a, 2026b); European Parliament (2026); Public Law 119-111 (2026); OFAC (2026). The Rosneft–Lukoil designation is dated only as “October” in the sources consulted. “Author” marks interpretation; other entries are documented facts or reported statements.

Figure 2. Russia’s share of India’s crude oil imports rose from about 2% to 36% in two years, then eased (per cent, by volume).

Sources: DGCI&S (2025) for 2022-23 (21.6), 2023-24 (35.9) and 2024-25 (35.8), from Russian volumes of 50.85, 83.02 and 87.54 million tonnes against total imports of 235.52, 231.46 and 244.50 million tonnes; CPR (2025) for 2018-19 (about 1; it also gives 35.8 for 2024-25); Deccan Chronicle (2024), reporting ICRA, for 2021-22 (about 2). 2025-26 (33) is Reuters (2026c) ship-tracking data, not customs data; in the overlapping year 2024-25 tracking and customs agree (36 against 35.8). 2019-20 and 2020-21 are omitted. Author’s calculations: shares change by +19.6 points (2021-22 to 2022-23), +14.3 (to 2023-24) and −0.1 (to 2024-25); Russian volumes rose 63.3% in 2023-24 and 5.4% in 2024-25. A share is not a volume; total imports also moved.

Table 2. Cross-case comparative metrics (author's calculations)

Metric	Inputs and formula	Result	Reading
(a) Penalty against discount (India)	Duty = 25% × $48.2bn exposed exports = $12.05bn. Discount saving ≈ $5.0bn a year. Break-even incidence = 5.0 ÷ 12.05	2.4×; 41%	If Indian exporters bore more than about 41% of the duty, the penalty outweighed the discount. A threshold, not an incidence estimate.
(b) Penalty against cost of halting (India)	SBI: halting adds $9bn to the 2025-26 fuel bill. 9.0 ÷ 12.05	75%	The duty would also exceed the cost of stopping Russian purchases if India bore more than about 75% of it.
(c) Adjustment window	US Act: 18 Sep to 18 Oct 2026 = 30 days. EU Reg. 2026/261: 26 Jan 2026 to 1 Jan 2027 = 340 days. EU Art. 3ma: 18 Jul 2025 to 21 Jan 2026 = 187 days	30 against 340 days (11×); 187 days	The EU gives its own LNG buyers longer than it gave third-country refiners; the US gives third-country buyers one month.
(d) Time to relief	GL 133: 28 Feb to 5 Mar 2026 = 5 days. GL 135: 22 Sep to 9 Oct 2026 = 17 days	5 and 17 days	Relief followed price shocks within three weeks; windows for others ran from one month to most of a year.
(e) Scale benchmark	India’s Russian crude arrivals, June 2026: 2.82 mb/d × 30 days = 84.6 million barrels. US diesel package: 13.5 (firm) and 36.0 (full) million barrels	6.3× and 2.4×	One month of India’s intake exceeds the whole package: scale narrows the comparison but does not remove the pattern.
(f) Buyer volumes	2024-25: China 108.5 Mt; India 87.54 Mt. 87.54 ÷ 108.5	81%	India’s volumes place it among the largest buyers, so the Act’s top-five test captures it.

Sources: Outlook Business (2025); CPR (2025); ANI (2025); Public Law 119-111 (2026); European Parliament (2026); Fieldfisher (2025); Reuters (2026b); OFAC (2026); MercoPress (2026); Business Standard (2026); DGCI&S (2025); Table 3. Rows (a) and (b) combine figures from different years and are indicative; the incidence thresholds do not estimate who bore the duty.

3. When American interests change the rules

General License (GL) 133 of 5 March 2026, five days after the Iran war began (Reuters 2026b), let Indian buyers take Russian cargoes already at sea; GL 134 and two renewals extended relief to all buyers until 17 June, each renewal following a statement that none was planned (Baker McKenzie 2026a, 2026b; AP 2026; Kyiv Independent 2026a). GL 135 came 17 days after US diesel set a record on 22 September (MercoPress 2026) and differs in kind: no loading-date cut-off, an explicit reference to imports into the United States, six months' duration, Russian sovereign accounts excluded (OFAC 2026).

Scale is the obvious objection. The three firm tranches, 1.8 million tonnes or 13.5 million barrels, equal 3.5 days of US distillate consumption; even the conditional 4.8 million tonnes cover 9.4 days (Table 3). India's Russian crude arrivals in June 2026 alone, 84.6 million barrels, were 2.4 times the whole package (Table 2). Futures fell 4-5 per cent on the news (Reuters 2026d): association, not proof of a price effect.

The inconsistency lies in sequence and asymmetry. The licence preceded by nine days the date from which new Indian purchases can attract the statute's duties, and the Act preserves presidential waivers and Treasury licensing power (Public Law 119-111 2026, secs. 114-115).

Table 3. Scale of the announced Russian diesel arrangement (author's calculations)

Tranche	Tonnes (Mt)	Barrels (million)	Days of US distillate consumption	Share of 2026 US distillate consumption	Days of US net distillate exports	Gross value at $4.64/gal ($bn, upper bound)
Immediate (announced 9 Oct)	0.3	2.25	0.6	0.16%	1.7	0.4
Firm tranches (0.3 + 0.5 + 1.0)	1.8	13.5	3.5	1.0%	10.2	2.6
Including conditional 3.0 Mt	4.8	36.0	9.4	2.6%	27.1	7.0

Method and sources: barrels = tonnes × 7.5, the ratio implied by Reuters (2026d) (300,000 t ≈ 2.25 million barrels). Denominators from EIA (2026): US distillate consumption of 3.84 mb/d (2026 average, including a forecast fourth quarter), or 1,401.6 million barrels a year; US net distillate exports of 1.33 mb/d. Gross value = barrels × 42 gallons × $4.64 a gallon (ULSD futures after the announcement, Reuters 2026d); it ignores discounts, freight and the share the Russian state captures, so it is an upper bound. Tonnages are the President’s announced commitments (Colorado Politics 2026), not verified deliveries; the 3.0 Mt tranche is conditional on the state of Russian refineries. Russia had freed 500,000 t of exports by 10 October (Kyiv Independent 2026b).

4. India's energy security and strategic autonomy

India imported about 88 per cent of its oil needs in 2023-24 (Business Standard 2024) and roughly half of its crude transited Hormuz in early 2026 (Kpler, cited in ThePrint 2026). The discount alone is a modest prize: Russian crude landed 14.1 per cent below other crude in 2022-23 and 10.4 per cent in 2023-24, worth about $5 billion a year, or 3-4 per cent of the bill (CPR 2025). The stronger case is optionality: SBI estimated that halting purchases would add $9 billion to the 2025-26 fuel bill (ANI 2025).

Behaviour fits that logic (Figure 3). Under tariff and sanctions pressure Russian arrivals halved, from 2.09 million barrels per day in June 2025 to 1.04 in February 2026; when Hormuz closed they rose 171 per cent to a record 2.82 in June 2026 (Business Standard 2026). Tariffs, the Rosneft-Lukoil sanctions and compliance frictions overlap in the first fall (Reuters 2026a; ThePrint 2026), so this is association only.

Strategic autonomy is not alignment with Moscow; it is declining to let one supplier set, or one coercer veto, the whole portfolio, which now spans about 40 countries (ANI 2025). Minister Jaishankar's formula, “I buy oil based on cost and availability” (Jalali 2026), has an economic logic the data support: with the United States taking $86.5 billion of Indian goods in 2024-25, hedging is the rational response to asymmetric dependence (cf. Farrell and Newman 2019).

Figure 3. India’s Russian crude arrivals halved between June 2025 and February 2026, then reached a record 2.82 million barrels a day in June 2026.

Source: Kpler data as reported by Business Standard (2026). Author’s calculations: June 2025 to February 2026, −50.2%; February to June 2026, +171.2%; June 2025 to June 2026, +34.9%. Overlapping influences: US duty (27 Aug 2025 to 7 Feb 2026), Rosneft–Lukoil sanctions (in force 21 Nov 2025), compliance frictions, the Hormuz closure after 28 Feb 2026 and US licences (Mar–Jun 2026). Other trackers differ (Reuters 2026a reports 1.38 mb/d for December 2025 against 1.24 here); the series shows association, not causation.

5. The European comparison

The EU's exception differs in design. Regulation (EU) 2026/261 bans short-term Russian LNG contracts from 25 April 2026 and long-term contracts from 1 January 2027, 340 days after its adoption; the US Act gives third-country buyers 30 days (European Parliament 2026; Public Law 119-111 2026). Within the window, EU ports received 12.18 million tonnes of Yamal LNG in January-September 2026, 9.5 per cent more than a year earlier and 85 per cent of the project's recorded deliveries, at an estimated €7.88 billion (Urgewald 2026). The “record” needs care: by author's calculation volumes ran 16 per cent above 2025 in January-June but 13.6 per cent below in July-September (Figure 4).

Both Western actors treat their own adjustment more gently than others' (Figure 5; Table 4): the EU's own LNG window is 340 days against 187 for third-country refiners, constraining Indian exporters while exempting partners such as the United States (Fieldfisher 2025; Baker McKenzie 2026c), and the US gave itself immediate relief but third-country buyers 30 days. Section 113(d) shields gas importers below 15 per cent of Russia's gas exports that are cutting purchases; crude buyers get no equivalent (Public Law 119-111 2026).

Figure 4. EU imports of Russian Yamal LNG rose in January–June but fell in July–September 2026 (million tonnes).

Source: Urgewald (2026), analysis of Kpler cargo data, by discharge port. 2026 values: January–September 12.18, July–September 2.21 (reported); January–June 9.97 (author’s calculation). 2025 values are back-calculated by the author from the reported changes (+9.5% January–September; −13.6% July–September), accurate to about ±0.01 Mt: January–September 11.12, July–September 2.56, January–June 8.57. Urgewald’s expenditure estimate (€2.88bn, €3.08bn and €1.92bn in Q1–Q3; €7.88bn in total) multiplies EU tonnes by 13.7 MWh per tonne and a monthly TTF price (implied average about €47/MWh, author’s calculation); it is indicative, not verified payment. LNG volumes are not combined with oil.

Figure 5. Relief arrives in days; third countries are given a month, and the EU gave its own LNG buyers most of a year (days).

Sources and calculations: Table 2, rows (c) and (d). Dates: Reuters (2026b); Baker McKenzie (2026a); MercoPress (2026); OFAC (2026); Public Law 119-111 (2026); Fieldfisher (2025); European Parliament (2026). The EU’s 340 days run from the regulation’s date (26 January 2026); from entry into force on 3 February 2026 the window is 332 days.

Table 4. Comparative framework: United States, India and European Union

Criterion	United States	India	European Union
Energy product and origin	Russian-origin diesel (refined product), GL 135	Russian crude, refined at home; products partly re-exported	Russian LNG (Yamal), now under long-term contracts
Dependence and exposure	Net distillate exporter (1.33 mb/d, 2026) but East Coast distillate stocks 32% below the five-year average in September	About 88% import-dependent; about half of crude transited Hormuz in early 2026	EU ports took 85% of Yamal’s recorded deliveries; France about three-quarters of September cargoes
Instrument and legal basis	OFAC GL 135 (9 Oct 2026 to 7 Apr 2027); separate statutes: 2022 import ban, 2026 Graham Act	Sovereign sourcing by refiners; exposed to US duties (EO 14329; Graham Act §113) and EU Art. 3ma	Reg. (EU) 2026/261 and Reg. 833/2014: scheduled phase-out
Own versus others’ purchases	Own: immediate licensed relief. Others: duties threatened on top-five buyers (§113), with a gas carve-out (§113(d))	Own: sourcing by cost and availability. Others: no restrictions imposed	Own: dated phase-out. Others: ban on products refined from Russian crude (Art. 3ma), partners exempt
Adjustment window	Itself: 0 days. Third-country buyers: 30 days	Not applicable (target of both)	Itself: 340 days (LNG). Third-country refiners: 187 days
Stated rationale	Lower fuel prices before the midterms (as reported); Treasury: supply to the global market	“Cost and availability” (Jaishankar); consumers’ interest	End dependence, with a transition for existing contracts
Documented economic incentive	Futures down 4–5% on the news; retail diesel $6.29/gal (September)	Russian crude 14.1% (2022-23) and 10.4% (2023-24) cheaper; about $5bn a year	Estimated €7.88bn Yamal bill, January–September 2026 (benchmark-based)
Outcome to 11 Oct 2026	No verified deliveries; 1.8 to 4.8 Mt announced	Russian share 36% (2024), 33.3% (2025); monthly record 2.82 mb/d (June 2026)	Volumes +9.5% January–September; July–September −13.6%
Distribution of costs and benefits	US diesel users gain if prices fall; Russian exporters gain; Kyiv objects that relief eases pressure on Moscow	Refiners and consumers gain; exporters carry US tariff risk	Russian LNG producers; importing states, chiefly France
Credibility implication (author’s assessment)	Highest cost: discretionary relief coincides with duties threatened on others	Sourcing logic consistent; vulnerability is coercive exposure	Lower cost: relief is legislated and dated, though flows still dilute the “cut revenue” aim

Sources: OFAC (2026); EIA (2026); Reuters (2026a, 2026d); Business Standard (2024, 2026); ThePrint (2026); CPR (2025); Jalali (2026); Urgewald (2026); European Parliament (2026); Fieldfisher (2025); Public Law 119-111 (2026); Ship & Bunker (2026); Kyiv Independent (2026b). The rows on own versus others’ purchases, adjustment window and credibility are the author’s synthesis.

6. Counterargument and critical evaluation

The strongest objection is that the cases differ (P4). Treasury defended the March licences by noting that Russia raises most energy revenue at extraction, so relief adds little (Kyiv Independent 2026a); the same logic may apply to diesel, though that is unproven. The third-country duties target crude and gas buyers, not diesel, and were not yet imposed. A licence also leaves statutory questions open: the 2022 import ban stands and section 112 duties of up to 500 per cent must be reconciled before a barrel enters US commerce (Ship & Bunker 2026; Public Law 119-111 2026).

These distinctions narrow the claim without dissolving it. Scale does not decide credibility; pattern does: two relief episodes in seven months, each within three weeks of a price shock, signal that enforcement is conditional on the sanctioner's costs.

Table 5. Propositions tested and verdicts (author's assessment)

Proposition	Evidence	Verdict
P1. US relief tracks the sanctioner’s price stress	GL 133 five days after the Iran war began; GL 135 17 days after the diesel price record; two renewals after statements that none was planned (Tables 1 and 2)	Supported as association; causation not identified
P2. Penalties track the target’s dependence, not harm to Russia	Duty exposure of $12bn on a $48bn base; Indian intake halved, then rebounded; a statutory gas carve-out with no crude equivalent (Figure 3; Table 2)	Partly supported; concurrent sanctions confound
P3. The EU’s exception differs by design	Legislated dates; 340-day window against 30 for third-country buyers; Yamal volumes +9.5% overall but −13.6% in July–September (Figures 4 and 5)	Supported; flows remain sizeable
P4 (objection). Scale explains the difference	Package equals 1% to 2.6% of annual US distillate demand; one month of India’s intake is 2.4 times the package (Tables 2 and 3)	Narrows the claim; does not dissolve it
P5 (objection). India’s sourcing reflects the discount alone	Discount about $5bn (3–4% of the bill); halting would cost $9bn (SBI); about half of crude transits Hormuz (CPR 2025; ANI 2025; ThePrint 2026)	Rejected as a sole explanation

Verdicts are the author’s judgement from the associations documented in this article; none rests on a statistical test.

7. Conclusion: The credibility cost of selective sanctions

The evidence supports P1 and P3, and P2 only in part (Table 5). Washington relaxed Russian-energy restrictions twice in seven months soon after price shocks; it signed a statute exposing buyers such as India to duties in between; and India's Russian intake moved with constraints, not allegiance. It does not establish that GL 135 will lower US prices or that Western actors behave alike. Open: the 18 October determinations and any actual delivery.

Sanctions succeed in roughly a third of historical cases, more often when target costs are large (Hufbauer et al. 2007). Exceptions that track the sanctioner's pain while penalties track the target's dependence invite hedging; India's energy autonomy is one such hedge, and an economically rational one.

References

ANI. 2025. “India’s Fuel Bill May Rise by USD 9bn in FY26 and 12 Billion in FY27, if It Stops Russian Oil Imports: SBI.” Tribune India, August 8. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/business/indias-fuel-bill-may-rise-by-usd-9bn-in-fy26-and-12-billion-in-fy27-if-it-stops-russian-oil-imports-sbi.

AP (Associated Press). 2026. “US Extends Waiver on Russian Oil Sanctions to Ease Iran War Shortages despite Bessent Denial.” April 18. https://www.wsls.com/business/2026/04/18/us-extends-waiver-on-russian-oil-sanctions-to-ease-iran-war-shortages-despite-bessent-denial/.

Baker McKenzie. 2026a. “Temporary OFAC General Licenses Authorize Transactions Involving Russian-Origin Crude Oil and Petroleum.” Sanctions News, March. https://sanctionsnews.bakermckenzie.com/temporary-ofac-general-licenses-authorize-transactions-involving-russian-origin-crude-oil-and-petroleum/.

Baker McKenzie. 2026b. “OFAC Issues General License No. 134C Extending Authorization for Certain Russia-Origin Crude Oil and Petroleum Product Transactions.” Sanctions News, May 18. https://sanctionsnews.bakermckenzie.com/ofac-issues-general-license-no-134c-extending-authorization-for-certain-russia-origin-crude-oil-and-petroleum-product-transactions/.

Baker McKenzie. 2026c. “EU Prohibitions on Import of Refined Petroleum Products Enter into Force.” Sanctions News. https://sanctionsnews.bakermckenzie.com/eu-prohibitions-on-import-of-refined-petroleum-products-enter-into-force/.

Business Standard. 2024. “Russian Discounts Shrank India’s Crude Oil Import Bill by 15.9% in FY24.” April 17. https://www.business-standard.com/economy/news/russian-discounts-shrank-india-s-crude-oil-import-bill-by-15-9-in-fy24-124041700838_1.html.

Business Standard. 2026. “India’s Russian Oil Imports: From War-Era Discounts to Trump-Era Shifts.” September 17. https://www.business-standard.com/amp/economy/news/india-russian-oil-imports-from-war-era-discounts-to-trump-era-shifts-126091700579_1.html.

Colorado Politics. 2026. “Trump Announces Diesel Fuel Deal with Russia.” October 9. https://www.coloradopolitics.com/2026/10/09/trump-announces-diesel-fuel-deal-with-russia/.

CPR (Centre for Policy Research). 2025. CPR Insights note on India’s crude imports from Russia, analysing Ministry of Commerce data. September 19. https://cprindia.org/?p=46923.

Deccan Chronicle. 2024. “Russian Oil Imports Save India $7.9B in FY24” (reporting ICRA analysis of Commerce Ministry data). https://deccanchronicle.com/business/economics/russian-oil-imports-save-india-79b-in-fy24-891929.

DGCI&S (Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics), Ministry of Commerce and Industry. 2025. Insights into Import of Crude Oil and International Crude Oil Prices. Commercial Intelligence Division, September–October. https://www.dgciskol.gov.in/writereaddata/Downloads/20251024153605Insights%20into%20Import%20of%20Crude%20Oil%20and%20International%20Crude%20Oil%20prices%20.pdf.

Drezner, Daniel W. 1999. The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

EIA (US Energy Information Administration). 2026. Short-Term Energy Outlook, October 2026. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy, October 6. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/pdf/steo_full.pdf.

European Parliament. 2026. Legislative Observatory summary of Regulation (EU) 2026/261 on phasing out Russian gas imports. https://oeil.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/document-summary?id=1885505.

Farrell, Henry, and Abraham L. Newman. 2019. “Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion.” International Security 44 (1): 42–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351.

Fieldfisher. 2025. “The EU’s 18th Sanctions Package against Russia.” https://www.fieldfisher.com/en/insights/the-eu-s-18th-sanctions-package-against-russia.

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Jeffrey J. Schott, Kimberly Ann Elliott, and Barbara Oegg. 2007. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Jalali, Ujwal. 2026. “US Asked India to Buy Russian Oil in 2022 to Stabilise Global Markets: Jaishankar.” The Tribune, June 12. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/india/us-asked-india-to-buy-russian-oil-in-2022-to-stabilise-global-markets-jaishankar/.

Kyiv Independent. 2026a. “US Treasury Says No Plans to Renew Waiver for Russian Oil at Sea, AP Reports.” April 25. https://kyivindependent.com/us-treasury-says-no-plans-to-renew-waiver-for-russian-oil-at-sea-ap-reports/.

Kyiv Independent. 2026b. “Russia Partially Lifts Ban on Diesel Exports after Trump-Putin Deal.” October 10. https://kyivindependent.com/russia-partially-lifts-ban-on-diesel-exports-after-trump-putin-deal/.

MercoPress. 2026. “Trump Says Russia Will Supply Millions of Tonnes of Diesel as US Eases Sanctions on Moscow.” October 9. https://en.mercopress.com/2026/10/09/trump-says-russia-will-supply-millions-of-tonnes-of-diesel-as-us-eases-sanctions-on-moscow.

OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control). 2026. General License No. 135, “Authorizing Transactions Related to the Sale, Delivery, Offloading, and Importation of Diesel Fuel of Russian Federation Origin.” US Department of the Treasury, October 9. https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/937216/download?inline=.

Outlook Business. 2025. “Indian Goods to Face 50% Tariff in US from Aug 27; Exports of USD 48 Bn to Be Hit.” PTI, August 26. https://www.outlookbusiness.com/news/indian-goods-to-face-50-tariff-in-us-from-aug-27-exports-of-usd-48-bn-to-be-hit.

Public Law 119-111. 2026. Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026. Approved September 18. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ111/pdf/PLAW-119publ111.pdf.

Reuters. 2026a. “OPEC Regains Share in India as Russian Oil Imports Slump in December.” January 15. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/opec-regains-share-india-russian-155130777.html.

Reuters. 2026b. “Israel and US Launch Strikes on Iran.” February 28. https://www.citizen.digital/news/israel-and-us-launch-strikes-on-iran-n378259.

Reuters. 2026c. “India’s March Crude Imports Slide on Iran War, Russian Volumes Hit Record High, Data Shows.” April 21. https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/indias-march-crude-imports-slide-060808096.html.

Reuters. 2026d. “Trump Says Russia to Supply Diesel to US and Global Markets.” October 9. Syndicated at https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/international/3990034-trump-says-russia-to-supply-diesel-to-us-and-global-markets.

S&P Global Commodity Insights. 2025. “EU Rules Out Mass-Balancing to Comply with Russian Oil Import Clampdown.” October 17. https://www.spglobal.com/commodity-insights/en/news-research/latest-news/refined-products/101725-eu-rules-out-mass-balancing-to-comply-with-russian-oil-import-clampdown.

SCOTUSblog. 2026. “Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump” (decided February 20, 2026). https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/learning-resources-inc-v-trump/.

Ship & Bunker. 2026. “US Lifts Sanctions on Russian Diesel for Six Months after Trump-Putin Call.” October 9. https://shipandbunker.com/news/world/445068-us-lifts-sanctions-on-russian-diesel-for-six-months-after-trump-putin-call.

ThePrint. 2026. “Russian Crude Never Left India’s Import Mix. It Made Up 1/3rd of Oil Imports from 2024 to 2026.” March 9. https://theprint.in/economy/russian-crude-never-left-indias-import-mix-it-made-up-1-3rd-of-oil-imports-from-2024-to-2026/2874224/.

Urgewald. 2026. “EU Imports Record 12.18 Million Tonnes of Russian Arctic LNG in First Nine Months of 2026.” Press release, October 9. https://www.urgewald.org/en/media/eu-imports-record-1218-million-tonnes-russian-arctic-lng-first-nine-months-2026.

White House. 2026. Executive Order 14384, “Modifying Duties To Address Threats to the United States by the Government of the Russian Federation.” February 6. Federal Register 91 (28), February 11. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-02-11/pdf/2026-02818.pdf.

Funding: No funding was received for this research.

Conflict of Interest: The author declares no conflict of interest.

(Author’s Bio: Vikas Bhardwaj is a scholar of international political economy, holding a Ph.D. and M.Phil. from the Centre for Russian and Central Asian Studies, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi. His work focuses on economic statecraft, sanctions, energy geopolitics, and global economic governance.

He has worked as a researcher with numerous institutions, including the Indian Institute of Public Administration (IIPA), contributing to multiple policy evaluation projects commissioned by the Government of India Ministries. Bhardwaj holds nine academic degrees and has published in international peer-reviewed journals on the Russian economy, geopolitical conflict, and shifting global power dynamics.)